Pages with the most revisions
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Showing below up to 250 results starting with #251.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.117 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.92 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.108 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.41 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.113 (4 revisions)
- OpTimber-LP (4 revisions)
- Hungary.37 (4 revisions)
- Finland.1 (4 revisions)
- Spain.102 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.94 (4 revisions)
- Forest Maps (4 revisions)
- Spain.68 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.84 (4 revisions)
- 2. Exploring options (4 revisions)
- Estonia.76 (4 revisions)
- CoPWorkingGroup (4 revisions)
- South Africa.47 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.5 (4 revisions)
- Germany.68 (4 revisions)
- Austria.111 (4 revisions)
- Russia.122 (4 revisions)
- Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to (4 revisions)
- Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has (4 revisions)
- Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the (4 revisions)
- STSM Opportunity MBMS development (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.54 (4 revisions)
- Chile.124 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.18 (4 revisions)
- Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage at a company combining both short rotation plantations and natural forest management in their operation (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.13 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.75 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.75 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.102 (4 revisions)
- Case Study Technical Committee (4 revisions)
- Greece.69 (4 revisions)
- TAURON.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Hungary.122 (4 revisions)
- DSS-WuK (4 revisions)
- Finland.63 (4 revisions)
- Spain.33 (4 revisions)
- Spain.88 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.3 (4 revisions)
- SIPAFIT.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field (4 revisions)
- China.43 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.75 (4 revisions)
- United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest (4 revisions)
- Germany.1 (4 revisions)
- End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important (4 revisions)
- Austria.97 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.81 (4 revisions)
- Chile.84 (4 revisions)
- Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions. (4 revisions)
- Brazil.38 (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.8 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.34 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.98 (4 revisions)
- Netherlands.131 (4 revisions)
- Which lessons are about knowledge management (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.104 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.17 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.82 (4 revisions)
- Spain.61 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.64 (4 revisions)
- Question: DSS for defining a problem (4 revisions)
- Sim4Tree.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited (4 revisions)
- South Africa.13 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.36 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on sustainable natural forest management in the Amazon basin (4 revisions)
- Morocco.33 (4 revisions)
- Germany.122 (4 revisions)
- J (4 revisions)
- Question: Which DSS has strategic temporal scale (4 revisions)
- Norway.96 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.25 (4 revisions)
- As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and (4 revisions)
- ToSIA.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.12 (4 revisions)
- OffREval (4 revisions)
- Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.109 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.53 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.52 (4 revisions)
- T(ree).Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.114 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.1 (4 revisions)
- Finland.122 (4 revisions)
- Spain.128 (4 revisions)
- Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on teak plantation (4 revisions)
- Spain.69 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.116 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.90 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.78 (4 revisions)
- Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites (4 revisions)
- Norway.1 (4 revisions)
- Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013 (4 revisions)
- China.106 (4 revisions)
- Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced (4 revisions)
- Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well (4 revisions)
- Austria.19 (4 revisions)
- Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change (4 revisions)
- Russia.20 (4 revisions)
- United States.1 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.58 (4 revisions)
- Chile.39 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.45 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.29 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.93 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.93 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.15 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.66 (4 revisions)
- Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? (4 revisions)
- Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders (4 revisions)
- Finland.7 (4 revisions)
- Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable (4 revisions)
- Ireland.47 (4 revisions)
- Canada.31 (4 revisions)
- Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region (4 revisions)
- The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be (4 revisions)
- South Africa.123 (4 revisions)
- Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic (4 revisions)
- Germany.120 (4 revisions)
- United States.33 (4 revisions)
- Projection of stand development increases knowledge base (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.9 (4 revisions)
- TerEval.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners (4 revisions)
- ToSIA.Software (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.103 (4 revisions)
- Brazil.44 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.36 (4 revisions)
- Italy.1 (4 revisions)
- Netherlands.132 (4 revisions)
- SØK.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Hungary.2 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.89 (4 revisions)
- RPF.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Spain.62 (4 revisions)
- Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to (4 revisions)
- Ireland.81 (4 revisions)
- New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ (4 revisions)
- South Africa.19 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.46 (4 revisions)
- Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users (4 revisions)
- Morocco.99 (4 revisions)
- Germany.5 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.50 (4 revisions)
- SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.40 (4 revisions)
- SifPlan.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.14 (4 revisions)
- Microforest (4 revisions)
- Portugal.23 (4 revisions)
- Stakeholder involvement (4 revisions)
- Sweden.67 (4 revisions)
- Italy.56 (4 revisions)
- Greece.11 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.6 (4 revisions)
- Finland.24 (4 revisions)
- Spain.31 (4 revisions)
- Spain.79 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.125 (4 revisions)
- Canada.1 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.86 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.85 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.71 (4 revisions)
- SADfLOR/DECfLOR (4 revisions)
- Norway.39 (4 revisions)
- China.40 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.14.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.112.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.23.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.71.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Sweden.67.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Italy.56.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Case Study Literature Methods Yin 2003 (3 revisions)
- Greece.11.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- '''1. Defining the problem''' (3 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 6 (3 revisions)
- Hungary.115.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Hungary.6.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Finland.24.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Spain.31.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Results are always strongly dependent on the quality of the underlying data (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.70 (3 revisions)
- Ireland.125.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Canada.1.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- KUBIK (3 revisions)
- China.40.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- South Africa.85.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Denmark.71.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Norway.39.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that (3 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? (3 revisions)
- Austria.83.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Forest Gales (3 revisions - redirect page)
- Morocco.118 (3 revisions)
- United States.21.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.73.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Chile.65.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 7 (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.48.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- MatrixGen (3 revisions)
- Brazil.37.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.70.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.31.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.95.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.101.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Hungary.16.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- DSSs (3 revisions - redirect page)
- Hungary.80.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- RODPOST (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.108 (3 revisions)
- Spain.51.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Ireland.56.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Canada.75.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice (3 revisions)
- Sweden.14 (3 revisions)
- Italy.126 (3 revisions)
- STSM Opportunities (3 revisions)
- Netherlands.133 (3 revisions)
- Case Studies List Full (3 revisions)
- South Africa.127.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Turkey.55 (3 revisions)
- Morocco.118.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Germany.121.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Norway.95.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Estonia.124.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- PEB (3 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs were developed in Italy (3 revisions)
- Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa (3 revisions)
- United States.65.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- NetWeaver (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.117.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.92.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- China.100 (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.108.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.108.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.41.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley (3 revisions)
- Sweden.14.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Italy.126.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Netherlands.133.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
