Long pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 50 results starting with #171.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. (hist) ‎T(ree) ‎[2,143 bytes]
  2. (hist) ‎NorFor ‎[2,133 bytes]
  3. (hist) ‎PLANFLOR ‎[2,122 bytes]
  4. (hist) ‎GB Forestry DSS ‎[2,091 bytes]
  5. (hist) ‎Import Lessons from test wiki ‎[2,076 bytes]
  6. (hist) ‎Community of Practice ‎[2,043 bytes]
  7. (hist) ‎Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry ‎[2,019 bytes]
  8. (hist) ‎TestDSS ‎[2,011 bytes]
  9. (hist) ‎Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful product testers ‎[2,005 bytes]
  10. (hist) ‎Heureka/RegWise ‎[2,002 bytes]
  11. (hist) ‎MicroLEIS ‎[1,998 bytes]
  12. (hist) ‎RPF ‎[1,979 bytes]
  13. (hist) ‎Best Practices ‎[1,973 bytes]
  14. (hist) ‎The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer ‎[1,966 bytes]
  15. (hist) ‎SiWaWa ‎[1,948 bytes]
  16. (hist) ‎Database ‎[1,902 bytes]
  17. (hist) ‎Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users ‎[1,893 bytes]
  18. (hist) ‎DSD.Software ‎[1,893 bytes]
  19. (hist) ‎SGIS ‎[1,884 bytes]
  20. (hist) ‎Sim4Tree ‎[1,876 bytes]
  21. (hist) ‎Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS ‎[1,847 bytes]
  22. (hist) ‎To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the ‎[1,842 bytes]
  23. (hist) ‎MyTestDSS ‎[1,839 bytes]
  24. (hist) ‎DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders ‎[1,833 bytes]
  25. (hist) ‎Austria ‎[1,817 bytes]
  26. (hist) ‎SifPlan ‎[1,800 bytes]
  27. (hist) ‎Expert System ‎[1,790 bytes]
  28. (hist) ‎PYL.Description of DSS development ‎[1,782 bytes]
  29. (hist) ‎Case Studies Analysis ‎[1,758 bytes]
  30. (hist) ‎Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions ‎[1,754 bytes]
  31. (hist) ‎Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities ‎[1,746 bytes]
  32. (hist) ‎Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders ‎[1,736 bytes]
  33. (hist) ‎Geo-SIMA-HWIND ‎[1,726 bytes]
  34. (hist) ‎To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort ‎[1,722 bytes]
  35. (hist) ‎TAURON ‎[1,718 bytes]
  36. (hist) ‎RODPOST ‎[1,716 bytes]
  37. (hist) ‎The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach ‎[1,715 bytes]
  38. (hist) ‎ForMIS ‎[1,712 bytes]
  39. (hist) ‎PROTEUS ‎[1,701 bytes]
  40. (hist) ‎PLANKAT ‎[1,701 bytes]
  41. (hist) ‎User's glossary ‎[1,696 bytes]
  42. (hist) ‎TerEval ‎[1,688 bytes]
  43. (hist) ‎EFIMOD.Software ‎[1,661 bytes]
  44. (hist) ‎SØK ‎[1,659 bytes]
  45. (hist) ‎SADfLOR/DECfLOR ‎[1,652 bytes]
  46. (hist) ‎End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important ‎[1,643 bytes]
  47. (hist) ‎Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions. ‎[1,628 bytes]
  48. (hist) ‎The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment ‎[1,627 bytes]
  49. (hist) ‎As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and ‎[1,619 bytes]
  50. (hist) ‎SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and ‎[1,615 bytes]

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)