Pages with the most revisions
From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Showing below up to 500 results starting with #1.
View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- WIS.2 (200 revisions)
- Knowledge Management tools (188 revisions)
- Main Page (99 revisions)
- LEaRNForME (89 revisions)
- User's manual (86 revisions)
- EMDS (71 revisions)
- DSS architecture and design (70 revisions)
- Umea 2013 Wiki WorkshopA (68 revisions)
- Capsis (68 revisions)
- Knowledge Management processes (61 revisions)
- EFIMOD (61 revisions)
- Practi-SFM (57 revisions)
- Spectrum (56 revisions)
- MfLOR (56 revisions)
- DTRAN (54 revisions)
- Participatory processes (53 revisions)
- SIMPPLLE (51 revisions)
- SGIS (49 revisions)
- Case Study Guidelines (47 revisions)
- MCDM Overview (45 revisions)
- LANDIS (43 revisions)
- ProgettoBosco (43 revisions)
- SADPOF (42 revisions)
- MAPSS (39 revisions)
- Wg4 workplan (38 revisions)
- Example DSS (38 revisions)
- SIMO (38 revisions)
- Heureka (37 revisions)
- Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus (36 revisions)
- FORSYS FAQ (33 revisions)
- GAYA (33 revisions)
- DSD (33 revisions)
- Participatory forest planning using MCDA in northern Sweden (32 revisions)
- Case Study Committee Workplan (31 revisions)
- CONES (31 revisions)
- Wiki Issue list (30 revisions)
- Case Study Literature DSS (30 revisions)
- United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan (29 revisions)
- LMS (28 revisions)
- PYL (27 revisions)
- ForMIS (27 revisions)
- ESC (26 revisions)
- My test (26 revisions)
- SADfLOR (26 revisions)
- Heureka/PlanWise (25 revisions)
- Types of knowledge (25 revisions)
- Participation in forest planning in southern Italy (24 revisions)
- SIPAFIT (23 revisions)
- Guidelines for the Country Report (23 revisions)
- Estonia (Country Report) (23 revisions)
- Case Studies (23 revisions)
- NED (22 revisions)
- ATestCase (22 revisions)
- Case-Lessons by WG themes matrix (21 revisions)
- Wg3 workplan (21 revisions)
- Esc (21 revisions - redirect page)
- 1. Defining the problem (21 revisions)
- Lessons Group Workplan 2013 (21 revisions)
- ForestGALES (21 revisions)
- DSS description Handbook (21 revisions)
- EMIS (20 revisions)
- SADMVMC (20 revisions)
- AVVIRK-2000 (19 revisions)
- 2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG (18 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs have spatial context (18 revisions)
- Participatory planning case template (18 revisions)
- Wg1 workplan (18 revisions)
- Has description (17 revisions)
- FMPP (17 revisions)
- Woodstock (16 revisions)
- Vista (15 revisions)
- Wiki TaskForce (15 revisions)
- SADfLOR/SAGfLOR (14 revisions)
- Import Lessons from test wiki (14 revisions)
- Classification of Knowledge Management tools (14 revisions)
- Mesta (14 revisions)
- FFIREDESSYS (14 revisions)
- Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use (14 revisions)
- Wg2 workplan (14 revisions)
- Agflor (13 revisions)
- Conifer Timber Quality (13 revisions)
- EnerTree (13 revisions)
- MELA (13 revisions)
- Case Studies Analysis (13 revisions)
- Herbicideadvisor (12 revisions)
- Case Studies List (12 revisions)
- ToSIA (12 revisions)
- SADfLOR/INfLOR (11 revisions)
- Question: Question: Which DSSs use Stochastic programming (11 revisions)
- Monsu (11 revisions)
- It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development (11 revisions)
- Which kinds of DSS focus on landscape quality (11 revisions)
- COST Action FP0804: FORSYS:Community Portal (11 revisions)
- Lower-case property values (import error) (11 revisions)
- OSMOSE (11 revisions)
- Emis (11 revisions - redirect page)
- Guideline (10 revisions)
- MONTE (10 revisions)
- Lessons from Country Studies (10 revisions)
- AFFOREST-sDSS (10 revisions)
- Test (10 revisions)
- Question: What FMDSS information is available related to climate change (10 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 1 (10 revisions)
- The Forest Time Machine (10 revisions)
- RPF (10 revisions)
- Update detailed documentation of how to create / edit new DSSs (10 revisions)
- HMSS (10 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs are developed/used to address that specific Forsys problem? (9 revisions)
- The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment (9 revisions)
- Hugin (9 revisions)
- Question: What kind of decision support techniques are implemented in DSS (9 revisions)
- 2011-11 Leuven Case Study Agenda (9 revisions)
- Test template (9 revisions)
- EFISCEN (9 revisions)
- Properties - Has domain - Has DSS development stage (9 revisions)
- Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator (9 revisions)
- To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort (9 revisions)
- Success criteria (8 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs were developed by large team of people (8 revisions)
- The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer (8 revisions)
- The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more (8 revisions)
- Заглавная страница (8 revisions)
- FVS (8 revisions)
- Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability (8 revisions)
- Import queries and other pages from the testwiki (8 revisions)
- Contry Report Category (8 revisions)
- Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network (8 revisions)
- Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic (8 revisions)
- GB Forestry DSS (8 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs support multiple objectives (8 revisions)
- The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual (8 revisions)
- Case Study Literature Methods (8 revisions)
- Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful product testers (8 revisions)
- Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly (7 revisions)
- STSM Call 2012-12 (7 revisions)
- Provide missing help-documentation service (7 revisions)
- Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process (7 revisions)
- 2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by Research Phase (7 revisions)
- The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local (7 revisions)
- Sim4Tree (7 revisions)
- DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders (7 revisions)
- Participation in forest planning in Sardinia (7 revisions)
- The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable (7 revisions)
- The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model (7 revisions)
- Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain (7 revisions)
- Participatory Planning in a Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company (7 revisions)
- Need for new models for the later use of a tool (7 revisions)
- TerEval (7 revisions)
- DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function (7 revisions)
- Need of a moderator function (7 revisions)
- TEAMS (7 revisions)
- Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users (7 revisions)
- SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders (7 revisions)
- Geo-SIMA-HWIND (7 revisions)
- Case-Lessons by ID with WG themes (7 revisions)
- Community of Practice (7 revisions)
- Wiki editing (7 revisions)
- HaRPPS (6 revisions)
- Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration (6 revisions)
- ETÇAP (6 revisions)
- A a test lesson (6 revisions)
- Criterium DecisionPlus (6 revisions)
- FORSYS Problem dimensions - necessary or not for Lesson (6 revisions)
- Import data Methods and Dimensions (WG2) (6 revisions)
- The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach (6 revisions)
- A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different (6 revisions)
- Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province (6 revisions)
- Methods and Models (6 revisions)
- T(ree) (6 revisions)
- An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be (6 revisions)
- Question: DSS for evaluating options (6 revisions)
- Some pages do not display (6 revisions)
- Enlarged decision space (6 revisions)
- The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project (6 revisions)
- Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the (6 revisions)
- From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used (6 revisions)
- HARVEST (6 revisions)
- Combo box vs. multiple values (Has other models) (6 revisions)
- Wiki User's glossary (6 revisions)
- The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders (6 revisions)
- Heureka/RegWise (6 revisions)
- 3. Evaluating options (6 revisions)
- SimForTree (6 revisions)
- New structure of the wiki start page (6 revisions)
- The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought (6 revisions)
- Herbicide Advisor (6 revisions)
- Case Studies Lessons List (6 revisions)
- Information about the properties (6 revisions)
- DSS for managing forest fire casualties (6 revisions)
- The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process (6 revisions)
- It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS (5 revisions)
- To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the (5 revisions)
- DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more (5 revisions)
- Use of adequate DSS development methodology (5 revisions)
- Quality flag: implementation still hanging (5 revisions)
- TAURON (5 revisions)
- TestTable (5 revisions)
- SiWaWa (5 revisions)
- The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain (5 revisions)
- Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions (5 revisions)
- Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the (5 revisions)
- Lessons from Survey (5 revisions)
- T (5 revisions)
- Question: DSS Commercial Product (5 revisions)
- An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better (5 revisions)
- Some of the queries in FAQ are not yet implemented (5 revisions)
- ClimChAlp (5 revisions)
- FORESTAR (5 revisions)
- Integration of decision support tools? (5 revisions)
- DSS architecture and design Workplan 2013 (5 revisions)
- Test query (5 revisions)
- SØK (5 revisions)
- Knowledge management process - definitions of alternatives are not clear enough fro a non-expert user (5 revisions)
- ForestGales (5 revisions)
- SifPlan (5 revisions)
- The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization (5 revisions)
- VDDT-Path (5 revisions)
- Help page navigation link changed to Category:Help (5 revisions)
- Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice (5 revisions)
- Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options (5 revisions)
- Russia.61 (4 revisions)
- Stakeholder involvement in DSS design (4 revisions)
- SGIS.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- United States.21 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.73 (4 revisions)
- Chile.65 (4 revisions)
- T2 (4 revisions)
- Austria.83 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.31 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.95 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.101 (4 revisions)
- Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.48 (4 revisions)
- Brazil.37 (4 revisions)
- Canada.75 (4 revisions)
- Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden (4 revisions)
- Hungary.16 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.80 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.56 (4 revisions)
- The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible (4 revisions)
- Spain.51 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.124 (4 revisions)
- T4 (4 revisions)
- WRR-DSS (4 revisions)
- Norway.95 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.127 (4 revisions)
- Germany.121 (4 revisions)
- Portugal-A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.117 (4 revisions)
- United States.65 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.92 (4 revisions)
- Forest multi-decision maker regional planning at the Portuguese Chamusca County (4 revisions)
- It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target (4 revisions)
- Portugal.108 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.41 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.113 (4 revisions)
- OpTimber-LP (4 revisions)
- 2. Exploring options (4 revisions)
- Hungary.37 (4 revisions)
- Finland.1 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.94 (4 revisions)
- Forest Maps (4 revisions)
- Ireland.84 (4 revisions)
- Spain.102 (4 revisions)
- Spain.68 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.76 (4 revisions)
- CoPWorkingGroup (4 revisions)
- South Africa.47 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.5 (4 revisions)
- Germany.68 (4 revisions)
- Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to (4 revisions)
- Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the (4 revisions)
- STSM Opportunity MBMS development (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.54 (4 revisions)
- Chile.124 (4 revisions)
- Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has (4 revisions)
- Austria.111 (4 revisions)
- Russia.122 (4 revisions)
- Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.13 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.102 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.75 (4 revisions)
- Case Study Technical Committee (4 revisions)
- Portugal.75 (4 revisions)
- TAURON.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.18 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage at a company combining both short rotation plantations and natural forest management in their operation (4 revisions)
- Greece.69 (4 revisions)
- Spain.88 (4 revisions)
- SIPAFIT.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Hungary.122 (4 revisions)
- Finland.63 (4 revisions)
- Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field (4 revisions)
- Ireland.3 (4 revisions)
- DSS-WuK (4 revisions)
- Spain.33 (4 revisions)
- End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important (4 revisions)
- United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest (4 revisions)
- China.43 (4 revisions)
- Germany.1 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.75 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.81 (4 revisions)
- Chile.84 (4 revisions)
- Austria.97 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations (4 revisions)
- Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions. (4 revisions)
- Portugal.34 (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.8 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.98 (4 revisions)
- Netherlands.131 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.104 (4 revisions)
- Which lessons are about knowledge management (4 revisions)
- Brazil.38 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.17 (4 revisions)
- Sim4Tree.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Hungary.82 (4 revisions)
- Question: DSS for defining a problem (4 revisions)
- Ireland.64 (4 revisions)
- Spain.61 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.25 (4 revisions)
- Morocco.33 (4 revisions)
- Question: Which DSS has strategic temporal scale (4 revisions)
- Norway.96 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.13 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.36 (4 revisions)
- Germany.122 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on sustainable natural forest management in the Amazon basin (4 revisions)
- J (4 revisions)
- The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited (4 revisions)
- ToSIA.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.12 (4 revisions)
- As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and (4 revisions)
- OffREval (4 revisions)
- Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non (4 revisions)
- Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.109 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.52 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.53 (4 revisions)
- T(ree).Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.114 (4 revisions)
- Spain.69 (4 revisions)
- Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities (4 revisions)
- Hungary.1 (4 revisions)
- Finland.122 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.116 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.90 (4 revisions)
- Spain.128 (4 revisions)
- Brazil-DSS usage on teak plantation (4 revisions)
- China.106 (4 revisions)
- Norway.1 (4 revisions)
- Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.78 (4 revisions)
- Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites (4 revisions)
- Russia.20 (4 revisions)
- United States.1 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.58 (4 revisions)
- Chile.39 (4 revisions)
- Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well (4 revisions)
- Austria.19 (4 revisions)
- Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced (4 revisions)
- Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change (4 revisions)
- Portugal.29 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.93 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.93 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.45 (4 revisions)
- Canada.31 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.15 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.66 (4 revisions)
- Finland.7 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.47 (4 revisions)
- Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders (4 revisions)
- Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? (4 revisions)
- Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region (4 revisions)
- Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable (4 revisions)
- South Africa.123 (4 revisions)
- Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic (4 revisions)
- Germany.120 (4 revisions)
- The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be (4 revisions)
- United States.33 (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.9 (4 revisions)
- Projection of stand development increases knowledge base (4 revisions)
- ToSIA.Software (4 revisions)
- United Kingdom.103 (4 revisions)
- Portugal.36 (4 revisions)
- Netherlands.132 (4 revisions)
- SØK.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- TerEval.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners (4 revisions)
- Italy.1 (4 revisions)
- Brazil.44 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.2 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.89 (4 revisions)
- New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ (4 revisions)
- Ireland.81 (4 revisions)
- RPF.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to (4 revisions)
- Spain.62 (4 revisions)
- Estonia.50 (4 revisions)
- Morocco.99 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.19 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.46 (4 revisions)
- Germany.5 (4 revisions)
- Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users (4 revisions)
- SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and (4 revisions)
- Switzerland.40 (4 revisions)
- SifPlan.Decision support techniques (4 revisions)
- Microforest (4 revisions)
- Stakeholder involvement (4 revisions)
- Portugal.23 (4 revisions)
- Sweden.67 (4 revisions)
- Slovenia.14 (4 revisions)
- Italy.56 (4 revisions)
- Greece.11 (4 revisions)
- Spain.79 (4 revisions)
- Canada.1 (4 revisions)
- Hungary.6 (4 revisions)
- Finland.24 (4 revisions)
- Ireland.125 (4 revisions)
- Spain.31 (4 revisions)
- SADfLOR/DECfLOR (4 revisions)
- Estonia.86 (4 revisions)
- China.40 (4 revisions)
- Norway.39 (4 revisions)
- South Africa.85 (4 revisions)
- Denmark.71 (4 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 6 (3 revisions)
- Portugal.23.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.112.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Sweden.67.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Case Study Literature Methods Yin 2003 (3 revisions)
- '''1. Defining the problem''' (3 revisions)
- Portugal.71.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.14.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Italy.56.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Greece.11.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Canada.1.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.70 (3 revisions)
- Hungary.115.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Hungary.6.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Finland.24.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Ireland.125.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Spain.31.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Results are always strongly dependent on the quality of the underlying data (3 revisions)
- KUBIK (3 revisions)
- China.40.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Norway.39.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- South Africa.85.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Denmark.71.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Guidelines/Problem Type 7 (3 revisions)
- Morocco.118 (3 revisions)
- United States.21.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.73.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Chile.65.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Forest Gales (3 revisions - redirect page)
- Austria.83.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? (3 revisions)
- The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that (3 revisions)
- MatrixGen (3 revisions)
- Portugal.31.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.70.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.95.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.101.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.48.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Brazil.37.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Canada.75.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.108 (3 revisions)
- Sweden.14 (3 revisions)
- Case Studies List Full (3 revisions)
- STSM Opportunities (3 revisions)
- Hungary.16.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Hungary.80.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Netherlands.133 (3 revisions)
- Ireland.56.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- DSSs (3 revisions - redirect page)
- Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice (3 revisions)
- RODPOST (3 revisions)
- Italy.126 (3 revisions)
- Spain.51.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Turkey.55 (3 revisions)
- Estonia.124.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Morocco.118.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Norway.95.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- South Africa.127.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Germany.121.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.117.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United States.65.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- NetWeaver (3 revisions)
- Switzerland.92.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- China.100 (3 revisions)
- Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow (3 revisions)
- Question: Which DSSs were developed in Italy (3 revisions)
- PEB (3 revisions)
- Portugal.108.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- United Kingdom.108.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Sweden.14.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Portugal.41.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Netherlands.133.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Slovenia.113.Decision support techniques (3 revisions)
- Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley (3 revisions)
