Long pages

From COST Action FP0804: FORSYS
Jump to: navigation, search

Showing below up to 500 results starting with #1.

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

  1. (hist) ‎SIMPPLLE ‎[23,257 bytes]
  2. (hist) ‎Knowledge Management tools ‎[20,999 bytes]
  3. (hist) ‎Participatory forest planning using MCDA in northern Sweden ‎[15,730 bytes]
  4. (hist) ‎ETÇAP ‎[14,926 bytes]
  5. (hist) ‎Monsu ‎[13,639 bytes]
  6. (hist) ‎EFIMOD ‎[13,233 bytes]
  7. (hist) ‎ProgettoBosco ‎[13,224 bytes]
  8. (hist) ‎LANDIS ‎[13,061 bytes]
  9. (hist) ‎Spectrum ‎[13,057 bytes]
  10. (hist) ‎LEaRNForME ‎[13,002 bytes]
  11. (hist) ‎MCDM Overview ‎[12,996 bytes]
  12. (hist) ‎MAPSS ‎[12,315 bytes]
  13. (hist) ‎Participation in forest planning in southern Italy ‎[11,903 bytes]
  14. (hist) ‎DTRAN ‎[11,836 bytes]
  15. (hist) ‎Finland-Strategic planning at the national forest administration ‎[11,767 bytes]
  16. (hist) ‎Case Study Guidelines ‎[11,639 bytes]
  17. (hist) ‎FVS ‎[11,467 bytes]
  18. (hist) ‎Knowledge Management processes ‎[11,113 bytes]
  19. (hist) ‎ForestGALES ‎[11,075 bytes]
  20. (hist) ‎MELA ‎[11,062 bytes]
  21. (hist) ‎Wg3 workplan ‎[10,924 bytes]
  22. (hist) ‎Natural Resources Planning in Metsähallitus ‎[10,794 bytes]
  23. (hist) ‎Agflor ‎[10,763 bytes]
  24. (hist) ‎ESC ‎[10,278 bytes]
  25. (hist) ‎AVVIRK-2000 ‎[10,000 bytes]
  26. (hist) ‎AFFOREST-sDSS ‎[9,975 bytes]
  27. (hist) ‎KM vocabularies ‎[9,380 bytes]
  28. (hist) ‎NED ‎[9,186 bytes]
  29. (hist) ‎MONTE ‎[8,784 bytes]
  30. (hist) ‎LMS ‎[8,731 bytes]
  31. (hist) ‎Wiki editing ‎[8,650 bytes]
  32. (hist) ‎HARVEST ‎[8,324 bytes]
  33. (hist) ‎Heureka/PlanWise ‎[8,304 bytes]
  34. (hist) ‎EnerTree ‎[8,259 bytes]
  35. (hist) ‎Practi-SFM ‎[7,977 bytes]
  36. (hist) ‎TEAMS ‎[7,817 bytes]
  37. (hist) ‎SIPAFIT ‎[7,810 bytes]
  38. (hist) ‎United States-The forest plan revision process in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest ‎[7,698 bytes]
  39. (hist) ‎FORSYS problem types ‎[7,682 bytes]
  40. (hist) ‎Wg4 workplan ‎[7,625 bytes]
  41. (hist) ‎Mesta ‎[7,570 bytes]
  42. (hist) ‎Woodstock ‎[7,390 bytes]
  43. (hist) ‎FORSYS FAQ ‎[7,374 bytes]
  44. (hist) ‎Criterium DecisionPlus ‎[7,314 bytes]
  45. (hist) ‎NetWeaver ‎[7,256 bytes]
  46. (hist) ‎SADfLOR ‎[7,201 bytes]
  47. (hist) ‎The Forest Time Machine ‎[7,097 bytes]
  48. (hist) ‎Capsis ‎[7,041 bytes]
  49. (hist) ‎EMIS ‎[7,026 bytes]
  50. (hist) ‎MfLOR ‎[7,002 bytes]
  51. (hist) ‎2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by Research Phase ‎[6,999 bytes]
  52. (hist) ‎Guidelines for the Country Report ‎[6,892 bytes]
  53. (hist) ‎Ireland-PractiSFM multi-resource inventory and decision support for private forest owners ‎[6,879 bytes]
  54. (hist) ‎Habplan ‎[6,665 bytes]
  55. (hist) ‎Forest multi-decision maker regional planning at the Portuguese Chamusca County ‎[6,557 bytes]
  56. (hist) ‎Germany-Actor Network Theory to Understand Collaborative Decision Support Systems Development in Forest Management Practice ‎[6,536 bytes]
  57. (hist) ‎Knowledge management and participatory processes Workplan 2013 ‎[6,511 bytes]
  58. (hist) ‎Herbicide Advisor ‎[6,395 bytes]
  59. (hist) ‎Herbicideadvisor ‎[6,288 bytes]
  60. (hist) ‎Classification of Knowledge Management tools ‎[6,229 bytes]
  61. (hist) ‎Umea 2013 Wiki WorkshopA ‎[6,203 bytes]
  62. (hist) ‎United States-Watershed Condition Assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan ‎[6,093 bytes]
  63. (hist) ‎DSS for managing forest fire casualties ‎[5,933 bytes]
  64. (hist) ‎GAYA ‎[5,922 bytes]
  65. (hist) ‎United States-The restoration strategy of the dry and mesic landscape in the Okanogan Wenatchee National Forest ‎[5,851 bytes]
  66. (hist) ‎Participation in forest planning in Sardinia ‎[5,793 bytes]
  67. (hist) ‎Sweden-The development and introduction of versatile DSS in Sweden ‎[5,780 bytes]
  68. (hist) ‎Case Study Literature Methods Yin 2003 ‎[5,602 bytes]
  69. (hist) ‎FMPP ‎[5,593 bytes]
  70. (hist) ‎DSS architecture and design ‎[5,365 bytes]
  71. (hist) ‎PYL ‎[5,314 bytes]
  72. (hist) ‎Participation in Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company ‎[5,285 bytes]
  73. (hist) ‎Belgium-Participative modelling of long-term wood production in the forest complex ‘Bosland’ ‎[5,149 bytes]
  74. (hist) ‎Italy-A comprehensive system for forest management planning in Trentino Province ‎[5,089 bytes]
  75. (hist) ‎2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes cross WG ‎[5,017 bytes]
  76. (hist) ‎SADMVMC ‎[5,014 bytes]
  77. (hist) ‎STSM Call 2012-12 ‎[4,986 bytes]
  78. (hist) ‎DSS description Handbook ‎[4,985 bytes]
  79. (hist) ‎Hugin ‎[4,958 bytes]
  80. (hist) ‎Spain-Sustainable Management of Mediterranean Forest: Valencian Community Case ‎[4,886 bytes]
  81. (hist) ‎Wg1 workplan ‎[4,874 bytes]
  82. (hist) ‎FORESTAR ‎[4,874 bytes]
  83. (hist) ‎HMSS ‎[4,790 bytes]
  84. (hist) ‎Germany-Using GISCAME to test alternative land-use scenarios under climate change in the Upper Elbe Valley ‎[4,789 bytes]
  85. (hist) ‎FFIREDESSYS ‎[4,714 bytes]
  86. (hist) ‎Lessons Group Workplan 2013 ‎[4,663 bytes]
  87. (hist) ‎ForestGales ‎[4,655 bytes]
  88. (hist) ‎EcologicalSiteClassification ‎[4,599 bytes]
  89. (hist) ‎Italy-Assessing forest functions at stand scale in a sub-regional forest plan in the Dolomites ‎[4,590 bytes]
  90. (hist) ‎Italy-ProgettoBosco a data-driven DSS for forest planning: an application in Abruzzo Region ‎[4,567 bytes]
  91. (hist) ‎Participatory Planning in a Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company ‎[4,353 bytes]
  92. (hist) ‎Participatory processes ‎[4,330 bytes]
  93. (hist) ‎2011-06 Thessaloniki Case Study Notes by WG ‎[4,226 bytes]
  94. (hist) ‎Spain-An agro-ecological Decision Support Systems for evaluting soil under scenarios of global change ‎[4,217 bytes]
  95. (hist) ‎SADfLOR/SAGfLOR ‎[4,199 bytes]
  96. (hist) ‎DSD ‎[4,080 bytes]
  97. (hist) ‎CONES ‎[4,050 bytes]
  98. (hist) ‎Case Study Committee Workplan ‎[3,900 bytes]
  99. (hist) ‎2011-11 Leuven Case Study Agenda ‎[3,854 bytes]
  100. (hist) ‎Heureka ‎[3,851 bytes]
  101. (hist) ‎Wg2 workplan ‎[3,820 bytes]
  102. (hist) ‎Question: Which DSSs are developed/used to address that specific Forsys problem? ‎[3,819 bytes]
  103. (hist) ‎COST Action FP0804: FORSYS:Community Portal ‎[3,777 bytes]
  104. (hist) ‎Portugal-Pulpwood Supply Chain Planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company ‎[3,763 bytes]
  105. (hist) ‎Success criteria ‎[3,754 bytes]
  106. (hist) ‎EFISCEN ‎[3,753 bytes]
  107. (hist) ‎Italy-Analysis of logging residues chain for a sustainable bioenergy production in Alta Val di Non ‎[3,733 bytes]
  108. (hist) ‎Conifer Timber Quality ‎[3,722 bytes]
  109. (hist) ‎Pareto Frontier Techniques are useful for multi-criteria forest management planning ‎[3,688 bytes]
  110. (hist) ‎Test template ‎[3,647 bytes]
  111. (hist) ‎EMDS ‎[3,583 bytes]
  112. (hist) ‎New Zealand-Modular Forest Management DSS in NZ ‎[3,580 bytes]
  113. (hist) ‎ClimChAlp ‎[3,562 bytes]
  114. (hist) ‎Guideline ‎[3,547 bytes]
  115. (hist) ‎Belgium-BoLa a specific sDSS to support land use planning in Flanders ‎[3,439 bytes]
  116. (hist) ‎Sweden-The history of a successfull forest DSS in Sweden ‎[3,337 bytes]
  117. (hist) ‎VDDT-Path ‎[3,304 bytes]
  118. (hist) ‎Wiki Semantic structure - DSS descriptions Workplan2013 ‎[3,288 bytes]
  119. (hist) ‎SADfLOR/INfLOR ‎[3,279 bytes]
  120. (hist) ‎STSM Opportunity USA VDDT Use in PNW National Forest Plans ‎[3,220 bytes]
  121. (hist) ‎Заглавная страница ‎[3,102 bytes]
  122. (hist) ‎Enlarge the decision space by generating a large set of potential management alternatives ‎[3,033 bytes]
  123. (hist) ‎Overcoming challenges of integrating DSS in strategic collaborative forestry scenario development. ‎[3,015 bytes]
  124. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Dimensions definitions ‎[3,006 bytes]
  125. (hist) ‎Case Study Literature DSS ‎[2,955 bytes]
  126. (hist) ‎WIS.2 ‎[2,950 bytes]
  127. (hist) ‎1. Defining the problem ‎[2,933 bytes]
  128. (hist) ‎Case Studies ‎[2,932 bytes]
  129. (hist) ‎Estonia (Country Report) ‎[2,908 bytes]
  130. (hist) ‎Main Page ‎[2,886 bytes]
  131. (hist) ‎The tracing of the current actor network interactions made the group realize that they need a different kind of stakeholders from what they previously thought ‎[2,866 bytes]
  132. (hist) ‎Need of flexibilization of analytical tools - no overdesigned tool that provides too much features for the use ‎[2,862 bytes]
  133. (hist) ‎SADPOF ‎[2,773 bytes]
  134. (hist) ‎FORFUN ‎[2,705 bytes]
  135. (hist) ‎OffREval ‎[2,705 bytes]
  136. (hist) ‎OSMOSE ‎[2,659 bytes]
  137. (hist) ‎PYL.Software ‎[2,615 bytes]
  138. (hist) ‎PractiSFM ‎[2,600 bytes]
  139. (hist) ‎SimForTree ‎[2,555 bytes]
  140. (hist) ‎Question: Which DSSs have spatial context ‎[2,554 bytes]
  141. (hist) ‎Knowledge Types ‎[2,548 bytes]
  142. (hist) ‎DSS architecture and design Workplan 2013 ‎[2,539 bytes]
  143. (hist) ‎Participatory planning case template ‎[2,527 bytes]
  144. (hist) ‎Microforest ‎[2,524 bytes]
  145. (hist) ‎ToSIA ‎[2,522 bytes]
  146. (hist) ‎STSM Opportunity NL DSS for scenario development ‎[2,521 bytes]
  147. (hist) ‎SIMO ‎[2,503 bytes]
  148. (hist) ‎The analysis of the actor network interactions allowed to identify the criticalities to be solved in order to develop the collaborative process ‎[2,498 bytes]
  149. (hist) ‎Visualization of the preliminary actor network made the people explicity include the DSS in a planning process ‎[2,473 bytes]
  150. (hist) ‎Example DSS ‎[2,430 bytes]
  151. (hist) ‎Projection of stand development increases knowledge base ‎[2,412 bytes]
  152. (hist) ‎It would have been better to involve some end users at earlier stages of the system development ‎[2,408 bytes]
  153. (hist) ‎HylobiusManagementSupportSystem ‎[2,363 bytes]
  154. (hist) ‎Great Britain The uptake of DSS in the forestry sector ‎[2,328 bytes]
  155. (hist) ‎Sim4Tree.Software ‎[2,324 bytes]
  156. (hist) ‎Enlarged decision space ‎[2,310 bytes]
  157. (hist) ‎Austria-Improving forestry extension services for small-scale private landowners ‎[2,293 bytes]
  158. (hist) ‎Wiki TaskForce ‎[2,286 bytes]
  159. (hist) ‎PSSis ‎[2,278 bytes]
  160. (hist) ‎DSS-WuK ‎[2,260 bytes]
  161. (hist) ‎Provide missing help-documentation service ‎[2,244 bytes]
  162. (hist) ‎CONES.Software ‎[2,239 bytes]
  163. (hist) ‎Case-Lessons by WG themes counts ‎[2,231 bytes]
  164. (hist) ‎Using Actor Network Theory in the design stage can help in understanding the dynamism of the network ‎[2,230 bytes]
  165. (hist) ‎Test ‎[2,229 bytes]
  166. (hist) ‎Provide a simple version of the DSS, which new users can try out and learn quickly ‎[2,207 bytes]
  167. (hist) ‎OpTimber-LP ‎[2,195 bytes]
  168. (hist) ‎The tracing of the actor network supported the identification of the key actors influencing the collaborative DSS implementation and institutionalization ‎[2,176 bytes]
  169. (hist) ‎User's manual ‎[2,172 bytes]
  170. (hist) ‎MatrixGen ‎[2,170 bytes]
  171. (hist) ‎T(ree) ‎[2,143 bytes]
  172. (hist) ‎NorFor ‎[2,133 bytes]
  173. (hist) ‎PLANFLOR ‎[2,122 bytes]
  174. (hist) ‎GB Forestry DSS ‎[2,091 bytes]
  175. (hist) ‎Import Lessons from test wiki ‎[2,076 bytes]
  176. (hist) ‎Community of Practice ‎[2,043 bytes]
  177. (hist) ‎Voting approaches can successfully be applied to participatory planning of forestry ‎[2,019 bytes]
  178. (hist) ‎TestDSS ‎[2,011 bytes]
  179. (hist) ‎Students studying forest management planning procedures and processes were very useful product testers ‎[2,005 bytes]
  180. (hist) ‎Heureka/RegWise ‎[2,002 bytes]
  181. (hist) ‎MicroLEIS ‎[1,998 bytes]
  182. (hist) ‎RPF ‎[1,979 bytes]
  183. (hist) ‎Best Practices ‎[1,973 bytes]
  184. (hist) ‎The choice to develop the system in an Excel environment was based on the status of computer ‎[1,966 bytes]
  185. (hist) ‎SiWaWa ‎[1,948 bytes]
  186. (hist) ‎Database ‎[1,902 bytes]
  187. (hist) ‎Requirement of specialized skills can discourage some potential users ‎[1,893 bytes]
  188. (hist) ‎DSD.Software ‎[1,893 bytes]
  189. (hist) ‎SGIS ‎[1,884 bytes]
  190. (hist) ‎Sim4Tree ‎[1,876 bytes]
  191. (hist) ‎Growth and Yield models are a key component of forest DSS ‎[1,847 bytes]
  192. (hist) ‎To meet the needs of customer - the Forest Service - and to obtain satisfying results the ‎[1,842 bytes]
  193. (hist) ‎MyTestDSS ‎[1,839 bytes]
  194. (hist) ‎DSS allowed to explain better some technical concepts to non-professional stakeholders ‎[1,833 bytes]
  195. (hist) ‎Austria ‎[1,817 bytes]
  196. (hist) ‎SifPlan ‎[1,800 bytes]
  197. (hist) ‎Expert System ‎[1,790 bytes]
  198. (hist) ‎PYL.Description of DSS development ‎[1,782 bytes]
  199. (hist) ‎Case Studies Analysis ‎[1,758 bytes]
  200. (hist) ‎Stakeholders contribution in ranking forest functions ‎[1,754 bytes]
  201. (hist) ‎Plan the system architecture based on a broad view of future possibilities ‎[1,746 bytes]
  202. (hist) ‎Metodology and results are transparent and easy-to-share to non-expert stakeholders ‎[1,736 bytes]
  203. (hist) ‎Geo-SIMA-HWIND ‎[1,726 bytes]
  204. (hist) ‎To compare the current and the past quantitative-qualitative parameters of the forest, great effort ‎[1,722 bytes]
  205. (hist) ‎TAURON ‎[1,718 bytes]
  206. (hist) ‎RODPOST ‎[1,716 bytes]
  207. (hist) ‎The development of large and enduring systems requires a long term approach ‎[1,715 bytes]
  208. (hist) ‎ForMIS ‎[1,712 bytes]
  209. (hist) ‎PROTEUS ‎[1,701 bytes]
  210. (hist) ‎PLANKAT ‎[1,701 bytes]
  211. (hist) ‎User's glossary ‎[1,696 bytes]
  212. (hist) ‎TerEval ‎[1,688 bytes]
  213. (hist) ‎EFIMOD.Software ‎[1,661 bytes]
  214. (hist) ‎SØK ‎[1,659 bytes]
  215. (hist) ‎SADfLOR/DECfLOR ‎[1,652 bytes]
  216. (hist) ‎End user engagement throughout the development and deployment cycle is very important ‎[1,643 bytes]
  217. (hist) ‎Portugal-Integrating an ecosystem model into SADfLOR Decision Support platform for optimal forest management planning under changing climate in boreal conditions. ‎[1,628 bytes]
  218. (hist) ‎The definition of standardized and specific criteria for selecting and zoning forest compartment ‎[1,627 bytes]
  219. (hist) ‎As the core of forest DSS are models describing the development of trees and stands (growth and ‎[1,619 bytes]
  220. (hist) ‎SIPAFIT sub-systems have been useful in training activities, and can be very useful to explain and ‎[1,615 bytes]
  221. (hist) ‎SIPAFIT can act sometimes as a referee to settle arguments among experts, users and stakeholders ‎[1,606 bytes]
  222. (hist) ‎The use of structured output (maps, tables and charts) makes the methodology and the results more ‎[1,568 bytes]
  223. (hist) ‎PEB ‎[1,568 bytes]
  224. (hist) ‎MGC Larch ‎[1,565 bytes]
  225. (hist) ‎The adoption of the collaborative learning method made possible to gradually select the conceptual ‎[1,551 bytes]
  226. (hist) ‎The fact that ProgettoBosco is conceived according to the criteria and indicators of sustainable ‎[1,548 bytes]
  227. (hist) ‎Portugal-A Decision Support System for eucalypt forest management under climate change scenarios ‎[1,546 bytes]
  228. (hist) ‎Case Study Template ‎[1,546 bytes]
  229. (hist) ‎Glossary OK ‎[1,545 bytes]
  230. (hist) ‎Wiki User's glossary ‎[1,545 bytes]
  231. (hist) ‎SIGFOR ‎[1,538 bytes]
  232. (hist) ‎WIS.2.Software ‎[1,537 bytes]
  233. (hist) ‎LEaRNForME.Software ‎[1,519 bytes]
  234. (hist) ‎STSM Opportunity MBMS development ‎[1,511 bytes]
  235. (hist) ‎Actor Network Theory provides a suitable lens for exploring both technical and human aspects of DSS institutionalization in the forestry domain ‎[1,500 bytes]
  236. (hist) ‎Intelligent Agent ‎[1,492 bytes]
  237. (hist) ‎Provide procedures and structure for complete data flow ‎[1,491 bytes]
  238. (hist) ‎Lack of proper documentation and support services (manual, website, etc) can severely limit the ‎[1,491 bytes]
  239. (hist) ‎United States-Boise-Payette-Sawtooth National Forest Plan ‎[1,477 bytes]
  240. (hist) ‎The activation of an iterative process through periodical meetings permitted to all the stakeholders ‎[1,474 bytes]
  241. (hist) ‎The ProgettoBosco working methodology, based on cooperation, successive approximations and ‎[1,466 bytes]
  242. (hist) ‎Regular ongoing engagement helped maintain interest of users ‎[1,458 bytes]
  243. (hist) ‎Embedding a DSS in a GIS software allows obtaining information at different spatial scales using the ‎[1,457 bytes]
  244. (hist) ‎Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services (timber and non-timber resources) in one and the ‎[1,446 bytes]
  245. (hist) ‎Users preferred enhanced functionality rather than useability ‎[1,446 bytes]
  246. (hist) ‎ToSIA.Software ‎[1,425 bytes]
  247. (hist) ‎Case Study Ideas ‎[1,394 bytes]
  248. (hist) ‎The DSS models built must match the knowledge of the local forest managers, so the ability for local ‎[1,389 bytes]
  249. (hist) ‎KUBIK ‎[1,382 bytes]
  250. (hist) ‎Providing procedures and structure for data flow from selection of field sample, performing field ‎[1,360 bytes]
  251. (hist) ‎My test ‎[1,360 bytes]
  252. (hist) ‎Forest managers have to analyze how their forest management interventions effect the landscape ‎[1,358 bytes]
  253. (hist) ‎The DSS gave the forest manager the opportunity to experiment how their emphasis towards certain ‎[1,352 bytes]
  254. (hist) ‎ClimChAlp.Software ‎[1,340 bytes]
  255. (hist) ‎Case Study Literature Methods ‎[1,338 bytes]
  256. (hist) ‎The software did not provide much support for formatting of the outputs in a format that could be ‎[1,335 bytes]
  257. (hist) ‎Getting joint funding from both the forest and environmental sectors can be a successfull for ‎[1,332 bytes]
  258. (hist) ‎The very easy user-friendly interface of the software and the clearness of method can be exploited ‎[1,328 bytes]
  259. (hist) ‎Brazil-DSS usage on short rotation eucalyptus pulp wood plantations ‎[1,325 bytes]
  260. (hist) ‎Knowledge mapping ‎[1,313 bytes]
  261. (hist) ‎TestDSS.Software ‎[1,311 bytes]
  262. (hist) ‎Need of a moderator function ‎[1,310 bytes]
  263. (hist) ‎Spatial variation between regions led to the development of different regional models, which led to ‎[1,301 bytes]
  264. (hist) ‎Linking methods and approaches to WG1 semantic wiki ‎[1,301 bytes]
  265. (hist) ‎An iterative process of presenting results to subject matter experts enabled them to better ‎[1,300 bytes]
  266. (hist) ‎T2 ‎[1,290 bytes]
  267. (hist) ‎Analysis at the landscape level allowed the integration of concerns about multiple resources as well ‎[1,285 bytes]
  268. (hist) ‎The use of the DSS improved communication among the planning team by providing a framework of the ‎[1,281 bytes]
  269. (hist) ‎Review of participatory technology development for WG2/WG4 ‎[1,279 bytes]
  270. (hist) ‎2. Exploring options ‎[1,274 bytes]
  271. (hist) ‎Modular approach helpful in assisting industry uptake ‎[1,263 bytes]
  272. (hist) ‎SIPAFIT.Software ‎[1,259 bytes]
  273. (hist) ‎Web portal ‎[1,259 bytes]
  274. (hist) ‎PLANFLOR.Software ‎[1,254 bytes]
  275. (hist) ‎The user has to be aware of the possibly large impact that the chosen land indicators and threshold ‎[1,253 bytes]
  276. (hist) ‎EMDS.Software ‎[1,253 bytes]
  277. (hist) ‎Test20130211.Software ‎[1,252 bytes]
  278. (hist) ‎Neighbourhood interrelations should be included in the generator ‎[1,245 bytes]
  279. (hist) ‎EFISCEN.Software ‎[1,239 bytes]
  280. (hist) ‎FMPP.Software ‎[1,239 bytes]
  281. (hist) ‎ProgettoBosco.Software ‎[1,224 bytes]
  282. (hist) ‎The use of EMDS allowed the planning team to identify priority area for restoration treatments that ‎[1,220 bytes]
  283. (hist) ‎DSS helped document and apply decision criteria consistently, and therefore produced a more ‎[1,218 bytes]
  284. (hist) ‎Interpretative case studies can help reduce the gap between research and practice ‎[1,215 bytes]
  285. (hist) ‎Some pages do not display ‎[1,213 bytes]
  286. (hist) ‎T4 ‎[1,190 bytes]
  287. (hist) ‎From a management perspective, to avoid the complication of testing something new, the models used ‎[1,182 bytes]
  288. (hist) ‎SADPOF.DSS development ‎[1,180 bytes]
  289. (hist) ‎The kinds of DSS traditionally used to calculate timber harvest levels are now being used to model ‎[1,178 bytes]
  290. (hist) ‎MyTestDSS.Software ‎[1,172 bytes]
  291. (hist) ‎Adapting the software to make it possible to easily include also the output of other mechanistic ‎[1,171 bytes]
  292. (hist) ‎Eis.4 ‎[1,171 bytes]
  293. (hist) ‎The DSS usage enabled the planning team to measure the achievement of the restoration goals ‎[1,167 bytes]
  294. (hist) ‎Use of the DSS has been considered successful by the participating organizations, even though it has ‎[1,158 bytes]
  295. (hist) ‎The analysis team used internal prototyping, which helped train the staff and identify possible ‎[1,153 bytes]
  296. (hist) ‎Model building was rapid, it was assembling the data that took by far the most time ‎[1,145 bytes]
  297. (hist) ‎A financial analysis is an important component in the discussion about the preferences of different ‎[1,144 bytes]
  298. (hist) ‎Despite the widely use and acceptance of the DSS there was still a lack of expertise to ‎[1,143 bytes]
  299. (hist) ‎BFH-HAFL ‎[1,135 bytes]
  300. (hist) ‎Has description ‎[1,133 bytes]
  301. (hist) ‎T(ree).Software ‎[1,124 bytes]
  302. (hist) ‎BOKU ‎[1,120 bytes]
  303. (hist) ‎The scope of the modeling project can change significantly during the project ‎[1,118 bytes]
  304. (hist) ‎STSM Opportunities ‎[1,110 bytes]
  305. (hist) ‎HylobiusManagementSupportSystem.Software ‎[1,108 bytes]
  306. (hist) ‎Running the DSS required special skills, therefore the local planning team required considerable ‎[1,103 bytes]
  307. (hist) ‎STSM opportunity Sweden FMPP implementation process ‎[1,103 bytes]
  308. (hist) ‎Need for new models for the later use of a tool ‎[1,102 bytes]
  309. (hist) ‎It should be possible to specify the rotation time of a species not only by age but also by target ‎[1,097 bytes]
  310. (hist) ‎An optimisation module comparing alternative scenarios based on multi-criteria analysis should be ‎[1,096 bytes]
  311. (hist) ‎Case-Lessons by WG themes matrix testing ‎[1,095 bytes]
  312. (hist) ‎RPF.Software ‎[1,092 bytes]
  313. (hist) ‎SIMO.Software ‎[1,089 bytes]
  314. (hist) ‎PYL.Decision support techniques ‎[1,086 bytes]
  315. (hist) ‎Decision criteria beyond the state of the ecosystem (for example, social values fire risk, economic ‎[1,082 bytes]
  316. (hist) ‎OpTimber-LP.Software ‎[1,082 bytes]
  317. (hist) ‎Biomasfor allows to obtain information at different spatial scale ‎[1,081 bytes]
  318. (hist) ‎Results are always strongly dependent on the quality of the underlying data ‎[1,072 bytes]
  319. (hist) ‎FORFUN.Software ‎[1,072 bytes]
  320. (hist) ‎It is necessary to know which data will be use as variables in the models before designing the DSS ‎[1,067 bytes]
  321. (hist) ‎Portugal-Supporting a multi stakeholders decision process in a Portuguese National Forest ‎[1,059 bytes]
  322. (hist) ‎DSS can help in varying the treatment according to more than one forest function ‎[1,047 bytes]
  323. (hist) ‎MELA.Software ‎[1,047 bytes]
  324. (hist) ‎A more informative output should be generated with clear graphs and maps indicating long-term ‎[1,045 bytes]
  325. (hist) ‎Question: What FMDSS information is available related to climate change ‎[1,042 bytes]
  326. (hist) ‎Afforestion and deforestation options should be included in the management options ‎[1,034 bytes]
  327. (hist) ‎SiWaWa.Support of social participation ‎[1,033 bytes]
  328. (hist) ‎Portugal-Developing a collaborative management plan for the NIFP in Vale do Sousa ‎[1,014 bytes]
  329. (hist) ‎SifPlan.Software ‎[993 bytes]
  330. (hist) ‎Case Study Technical Committee ‎[989 bytes]
  331. (hist) ‎Portugal-Tactical/operational forest planning in a Portuguese integrated Pulp and Paper Company ‎[985 bytes]
  332. (hist) ‎Group participation with knowledgeable people is a good way to ensure that the decision hierarchy is ‎[983 bytes]
  333. (hist) ‎Lower-case property values (import error) ‎[954 bytes]
  334. (hist) ‎Brazil-DSS usage at a company combining both short rotation plantations and natural forest management in their operation ‎[951 bytes]
  335. (hist) ‎3. Evaluating options ‎[949 bytes]
  336. (hist) ‎'''1. Defining the problem''' ‎[933 bytes]
  337. (hist) ‎TestTable ‎[932 bytes]
  338. (hist) ‎Question 1: Which DSSs can support the KM processes? ‎[931 bytes]
  339. (hist) ‎Methods and Models ‎[922 bytes]
  340. (hist) ‎VDDT-Path.mule deer ‎[920 bytes]
  341. (hist) ‎Workflow ‎[911 bytes]
  342. (hist) ‎SCION ‎[910 bytes]
  343. (hist) ‎Brazil-DSS usage on sustainable natural forest management in the Amazon basin ‎[906 bytes]
  344. (hist) ‎Simon's decision making model ‎[906 bytes]
  345. (hist) ‎Case Lessons involving software development CSV ‎[901 bytes]
  346. (hist) ‎Case Lessons involving knowledge management CSV ‎[898 bytes]
  347. (hist) ‎Case Lessons involving models & methods CSV ‎[897 bytes]
  348. (hist) ‎Multiple DSS are often needed to meet complex needs ‎[895 bytes]
  349. (hist) ‎Case Lessons involving participatory planning CSV ‎[891 bytes]
  350. (hist) ‎Monsu.Software ‎[889 bytes]
  351. (hist) ‎ETÇAP.Software ‎[871 bytes]
  352. (hist) ‎Operational aspects of the system should be enhanced ‎[870 bytes]
  353. (hist) ‎Case-Lesson-WG Themes CSV ‎[860 bytes]
  354. (hist) ‎Case Studies List Full ‎[855 bytes]
  355. (hist) ‎Enabling the analyses of several ecosystem services ‎[829 bytes]
  356. (hist) ‎Finland-Integrating wood quality considerations in landscape-level forest planning ‎[820 bytes]
  357. (hist) ‎HylobiusManagementSupportSystem.Description of DSS development ‎[818 bytes]
  358. (hist) ‎MONSU.Bilberry ‎[815 bytes]
  359. (hist) ‎MELA/DemoMELA ‎[807 bytes]
  360. (hist) ‎Brazil-DSS usage on teak plantation ‎[803 bytes]
  361. (hist) ‎Agflor.Software ‎[802 bytes]
  362. (hist) ‎CONES.Knowledge management process ‎[796 bytes]
  363. (hist) ‎CoPWorkingGroup ‎[793 bytes]
  364. (hist) ‎MONSU.Cowberry ‎[786 bytes]
  365. (hist) ‎WIS.2.Support of social participation ‎[785 bytes]
  366. (hist) ‎PYL.Support of social participation ‎[777 bytes]
  367. (hist) ‎United States.31 ‎[729 bytes]
  368. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Problem Type 6 ‎[727 bytes]
  369. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Problem Type 5 ‎[727 bytes]
  370. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Problem Type 4 ‎[727 bytes]
  371. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Problem Type 3 ‎[727 bytes]
  372. (hist) ‎Guidelines/Problem Type 2 ‎[727 bytes]
  373. (hist) ‎Portugal-Developing a management plan for the CHAMUSCA county ‎[724 bytes]
  374. (hist) ‎Heureka.Software ‎[723 bytes]
  375. (hist) ‎Slovenia.113 ‎[722 bytes]
  376. (hist) ‎Question: What kind of decision support techniques are implemented in DSS ‎[721 bytes]
  377. (hist) ‎OSMOSE.Software ‎[712 bytes]
  378. (hist) ‎Finland.7 ‎[711 bytes]
  379. (hist) ‎United States.33 ‎[706 bytes]
  380. (hist) ‎Hungary.80 ‎[706 bytes]
  381. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.70 ‎[700 bytes]
  382. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.109 ‎[700 bytes]
  383. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.8 ‎[700 bytes]
  384. (hist) ‎Slovenia.104 ‎[696 bytes]
  385. (hist) ‎Russia.61 ‎[696 bytes]
  386. (hist) ‎Slovenia.14 ‎[696 bytes]
  387. (hist) ‎Brazil.31 ‎[695 bytes]
  388. (hist) ‎Canada.31 ‎[694 bytes]
  389. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.32 ‎[693 bytes]
  390. (hist) ‎Norway.49 ‎[692 bytes]
  391. (hist) ‎United States.21 ‎[692 bytes]
  392. (hist) ‎Morocco.99 ‎[692 bytes]
  393. (hist) ‎Portugal.31 ‎[692 bytes]
  394. (hist) ‎EMDS.nwfp ‎[691 bytes]
  395. (hist) ‎Morocco.11 ‎[690 bytes]
  396. (hist) ‎Sweden.14 ‎[690 bytes]
  397. (hist) ‎United States.1 ‎[688 bytes]
  398. (hist) ‎ATestCase ‎[687 bytes]
  399. (hist) ‎Russia.113 ‎[687 bytes]
  400. (hist) ‎Greece.11 ‎[686 bytes]
  401. (hist) ‎Hungary.61 ‎[685 bytes]
  402. (hist) ‎China.106 ‎[685 bytes]
  403. (hist) ‎China.100 ‎[684 bytes]
  404. (hist) ‎Russia.68 ‎[684 bytes]
  405. (hist) ‎South Africa.123 ‎[684 bytes]
  406. (hist) ‎Morocco.107 ‎[683 bytes]
  407. (hist) ‎Spain.79 ‎[683 bytes]
  408. (hist) ‎China.60 ‎[682 bytes]
  409. (hist) ‎Slovenia.74 ‎[682 bytes]
  410. (hist) ‎Germany.68 ‎[682 bytes]
  411. (hist) ‎South Africa.47 ‎[681 bytes]
  412. (hist) ‎China.43 ‎[681 bytes]
  413. (hist) ‎Germany.121 ‎[680 bytes]
  414. (hist) ‎South Africa.127 ‎[680 bytes]
  415. (hist) ‎Spain.61 ‎[679 bytes]
  416. (hist) ‎Hungary.82 ‎[679 bytes]
  417. (hist) ‎Morocco.33 ‎[679 bytes]
  418. (hist) ‎Spain.31 ‎[678 bytes]
  419. (hist) ‎Greece.79 ‎[676 bytes]
  420. (hist) ‎Spain.68 ‎[676 bytes]
  421. (hist) ‎Russia.68.Decision support techniques ‎[676 bytes]
  422. (hist) ‎Spain.49 ‎[675 bytes]
  423. (hist) ‎Greece.69 ‎[673 bytes]
  424. (hist) ‎South Africa.19 ‎[673 bytes]
  425. (hist) ‎South Africa.78 ‎[673 bytes]
  426. (hist) ‎Portugal.98 ‎[672 bytes]
  427. (hist) ‎Spain.33 ‎[671 bytes]
  428. (hist) ‎Switzerland.9 ‎[671 bytes]
  429. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.13 ‎[671 bytes]
  430. (hist) ‎Russia.20 ‎[671 bytes]
  431. (hist) ‎Case-WG Themes CSV ‎[669 bytes]
  432. (hist) ‎Spain.69 ‎[669 bytes]
  433. (hist) ‎Wiki Issue list ‎[668 bytes]
  434. (hist) ‎Spain.51 ‎[668 bytes]
  435. (hist) ‎Canada.1 ‎[668 bytes]
  436. (hist) ‎Switzerland.81 ‎[667 bytes]
  437. (hist) ‎Portugal.1 ‎[664 bytes]
  438. (hist) ‎Sweden.52 ‎[663 bytes]
  439. (hist) ‎Which kinds of DSS focus on landscape quality ‎[662 bytes]
  440. (hist) ‎Ireland.81 ‎[662 bytes]
  441. (hist) ‎Hungary.1 ‎[662 bytes]
  442. (hist) ‎Switzerland.40 ‎[662 bytes]
  443. (hist) ‎Russia.8 ‎[661 bytes]
  444. (hist) ‎Canada.26 ‎[661 bytes]
  445. (hist) ‎Germany.1 ‎[661 bytes]
  446. (hist) ‎Slovenia.48 ‎[661 bytes]
  447. (hist) ‎Switzerland.58 ‎[660 bytes]
  448. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.87 ‎[659 bytes]
  449. (hist) ‎Finland.1 ‎[659 bytes]
  450. (hist) ‎Switzerland.73 ‎[659 bytes]
  451. (hist) ‎United States.65 ‎[659 bytes]
  452. (hist) ‎Slovenia.114 ‎[659 bytes]
  453. (hist) ‎Portugal.119 ‎[658 bytes]
  454. (hist) ‎Switzerland.54 ‎[658 bytes]
  455. (hist) ‎Austria.111 ‎[658 bytes]
  456. (hist) ‎Netherlands.131 ‎[657 bytes]
  457. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.112 ‎[656 bytes]
  458. (hist) ‎South Africa.85 ‎[656 bytes]
  459. (hist) ‎China.40 ‎[656 bytes]
  460. (hist) ‎Hungary.89 ‎[656 bytes]
  461. (hist) ‎Portugal.34 ‎[656 bytes]
  462. (hist) ‎Norway.1 ‎[655 bytes]
  463. (hist) ‎Finland.24 ‎[654 bytes]
  464. (hist) ‎South Africa.13 ‎[654 bytes]
  465. (hist) ‎Italy.1 ‎[654 bytes]
  466. (hist) ‎Hungary.66 ‎[654 bytes]
  467. (hist) ‎Slovenia.45 ‎[654 bytes]
  468. (hist) ‎TestDSS.Description of DSS development ‎[653 bytes]
  469. (hist) ‎Finland.63 ‎[653 bytes]
  470. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.108 ‎[652 bytes]
  471. (hist) ‎Spain.1 ‎[652 bytes]
  472. (hist) ‎Denmark.67 ‎[652 bytes]
  473. (hist) ‎Spain.62 ‎[652 bytes]
  474. (hist) ‎Hungary.115 ‎[651 bytes]
  475. (hist) ‎Morocco.118 ‎[650 bytes]
  476. (hist) ‎Hungary.2 ‎[650 bytes]
  477. (hist) ‎Portugal.41 ‎[649 bytes]
  478. (hist) ‎Sweden.67 ‎[649 bytes]
  479. (hist) ‎PSSis.Software ‎[649 bytes]
  480. (hist) ‎Hungary.94 ‎[648 bytes]
  481. (hist) ‎Test20130211.Description of DSS development ‎[648 bytes]
  482. (hist) ‎Hungary.16 ‎[647 bytes]
  483. (hist) ‎MyTestDSS.Description of DSS development ‎[647 bytes]
  484. (hist) ‎Switzerland.12 ‎[646 bytes]
  485. (hist) ‎Ireland.47 ‎[646 bytes]
  486. (hist) ‎Austria.105 ‎[645 bytes]
  487. (hist) ‎Germany.120 ‎[644 bytes]
  488. (hist) ‎Heureka.Support of social participation ‎[644 bytes]
  489. (hist) ‎SIMO.Description of DSS development ‎[643 bytes]
  490. (hist) ‎Norway.96 ‎[642 bytes]
  491. (hist) ‎Austria.83 ‎[641 bytes]
  492. (hist) ‎Austria.97 ‎[640 bytes]
  493. (hist) ‎Denmark.46 ‎[639 bytes]
  494. (hist) ‎Portugal.23 ‎[637 bytes]
  495. (hist) ‎Estonia.50 ‎[635 bytes]
  496. (hist) ‎Austria.19 ‎[633 bytes]
  497. (hist) ‎Brazil.37 ‎[633 bytes]
  498. (hist) ‎Heureka.Description of DSS development ‎[631 bytes]
  499. (hist) ‎Question: Which DSSs were developed by Sweden ‎[630 bytes]
  500. (hist) ‎United Kingdom.103 ‎[630 bytes]

View (previous 500 | next 500) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)